NevadaScams.com logo w/ Lear Family Trust indicator

Petition to Set Aside Accountings (continued)Rights and Duties of the Parties

3. RIGHTS, DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES

3.1        Petitioner

1.            Petitioner is a recognized beneficiary of LFT as defined under NRS §165.020(1)(b) and is entitled by LFT to a benefit and share of LFT's corpus principal, capital and undistributed income upon the death and decease of Petitioners' biological father, William P. Lear, Jr., or upon the termination of the Trust.  Exhibit 3, Article Fifth (b).

2.            Petitioner is entitled to receive notice of filing of an intermediate accounting and to receive a copy of the accounting under NRS §165.045 for every calendar year in which LFT Trustees have a duty to file an inventory under NRS §165.040.  Since August 13, 1982 LFT Trustees have an annual duty to file LFT accountings.

3.            Petitioner, as an interested party in and to the LFT, is entitled to receive legal notice regarding any litigation or Court filing pertaining to the LFT. Second Judicial District Court Order dated August 23, 1983; NRS §155.010.

4.            Petitioner has a guaranteed right to due process and equal protection of the law under the Constitution of the United States of America  and the Constitution of the State of Nevada . U.S. Constitution Amendment XIV; Nevada Constitution Article 1, Section 8, Clause 5.

3.2        Trustees

3.2.1 - Generally

5.            Petitioner, as LFT beneficiary, has not given the Trustees of the LFT a written instrument excusing them from performing any of their duties and has not exempted Trustees from liability for failure to perform such duties.  NRS §165.170; NRS §163.170; see also 90 C.J.S Trusts §252 & 90A C.J.S.Trusts §596.

6.            Trustees have a legal obligation to perform under and enforce the Last Will and Testament of William P. Lear, Sr (WPLSr).  See also Exhibit 25.

7.            Trustees have a legal obligation to perform under and enforce the terms and conditions of the LFT as amended by this Court.

8.            Trustees have a legal obligation to abide by the Constitution and laws of the State of Nevada.

9.            Trustees have a legal obligation to abide by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America.

10.        Trustees have a legal obligation to cause a notice of the time and place of a hearing of a petition regarding the LFT to be given to or served upon Petitioner. NRS §155.010.

11.        Furthermore, on August 23, 1983, this Court entered an Order, which was sent to Petitioner in August 1983, imposing a duty and obligation on LFT Trustees to advise Petitioner and other beneficiaries similarly situated of litigation  or threatened litigation  upon the Trust.  Said Order states in pertinent part:

 

"IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Trustees of Trust A  and the Trustees of Trust B shall have the authority to retain legal and accounting services of their own selection ... ; provided

....

(ii) The Trustees shall advise the Court and all parties of any litigation or threatened litigation which may have a significant impact upon the Trust Estate."

August 23, 1983 Order, p.17, lines 24-28 and p.18 lines 1-4

Exhibit 11

[Emphasis added]

 

12.        In their pleadings to the Court, Trustees have a legal obligation to describe the interests to be affected and to give timely and reasonable information to Petitioner and other beneficiaries similarly situated. NRS §155.140.

13.        As beneficiary of the Lear Family Trust, Petitioner has a right to notices and the Trust inventory, to true, correct, complete and accurate annual accountings, to an exhibition of trust property, to require specific performance from Trustees as well as to information and the privilege of inspecting trust records and papers. NRS §165.180; NRS §155.010; NRS §165.030; NRS §165.040; NRS §165.045; see also 90A C.J.S. Trusts §§ 321, 331, 587 & 594.

14.        Trustees have an obligation to furnish a true, correct, complete, and accurate accounting to all LFT beneficiaries, including Petitioner, pursuant to common law principles governing Trusts.  See Bogert on Trusts, Third Edition, West Publishing Company, chap. 16, Sec. 142, Duty to Render Court Accounting, pp. 537-539. 

15.        A trustee owes a beneficiary the highest degree of good faith, care, loyalty and integrity and is required to provide a beneficiary, upon request, complete and accurate information as to the nature and amount of the trust property, the management of said property and any information relative to the beneficiaries' interest in the trust.  In Re Marriage of Petrie, 19 P.3d 443 (Wash.App. Div.1 2001); Baker Boyer National Bank v. Garver, 719 P.2d 583, 584 (Wash.App. 1986); Bogert on Trusts, supra, chap.16, sec. 141, Duty to Furnish Information to the Beneficiary, p.534.  90A C.J.S. Trusts §§323, 330, 331.

17.        Trustees have an obligation to timely serve notices, produce inventories and furnish true, correct, complete and accurate annual accountings in accordance with this Court's August 13, 1982 Order which directs LFT Trustees that:

 

"7. Both Trust A  and Trust B shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of NRS Chapter 163  and accountings shall be rendered pursuant to NRS 165.030 through 165.120 ."

August 13, 1982 Court Order, page 1, §2

Exhibit 8.

 

18.        At all times relevant hereto, LFT Trustees had an obligation to produce documents and information relevant to the LFT, to the LFT's beneficiaries who have interests therein.

19.        At all times relevant hereto, LFT Trustees had an obligation to conform to the "prudent man" rule as codified and amended under NRS Chapter 164.

20.        At all times relevant hereto, LFT Trustees had a duty of impartiality toward the LFT beneficiaries and a duty to manage the LFT in the best interest of all the beneficiaries. NRS §164.220.

21.        At all times relevant hereto, LFT Trustees had a duty of undivided loyalty to the beneficiaries and were prohibited from placing themselves in a position where it would be for their own benefit to violate their duty to the beneficiaries.  See Scott on Trusts , William F. Fratcher, (Little, Brown & Company, 4th Edition, 1987), Volume IIA, page 311; 38 Am.Jur. POF3d 279.

3.2.2 - Appointment of Trustees

22.        On March 9, 1978, WPLSr and MOL appointed Sam Auld, Milton Weilenmann and Fran D. Jabara as co-trustees of the LFT.

23.        On September 8, 1978, this Court entered an Order confirming the appointment of LFT Trustees Sam Auld, Milton Weilenmann and Fran D. Jabara

24.        On August 13, 1982, this Court entered an Order bifurcating WPLSr's March 9, 1978 Trust into two separate trusts and provided for the appointment of three new Trustees of the LFT.  The Court ordered, "all nominees shall be persons of mature judgment and a good reputation for honesty and integrity."  This Court further ordered that:

 

"After the new three (3) individuals have been confirmed as Trustees of Trust B, any vacancies in the office of the Trustee of that part of the Trust shall be filled in the same manner as specified in the original Trust Agreement."

August 13, 1982 Order, page 6, §23, lines 20-23

Exhibit 8

 

 

25.        On January 17, 1983, this Court entered an Order Confirming Trustees of Trust B of the Lear Family Trust.  Said Order, at paragraph 2 of the "Conclusions of Law", confirmed and appointed Respondents DAYTON, MURPHY and ROWLEY as trustees of Trust B of the LFT pursuant to this Court's August 13, 1982 Order.  See also the December 20, 1982 Petition for Confirmation of Trustees of Trust B of the Lear Family Trust.  Exhibits 10, 8, 9, respectively.  This Court's Order of January 17, 1983 referred to above states in pertinent part:

 

"That said trustees shall administer Trust B in accordance with all of the powers, duties and responsibilities more particularly set forth in the Lear Family Trust instrument dated March 6, 1978 [sic], as if originally named as trustees therein and in accordance with this Court's Order of August 13, 1982 ."

Order Confirming Trustees, January 17, 1983, page 2, lines 26-31

[Emphasis Added]

Exhibit 10

26.        Respondents knew or should have known that under Nevada State law, the power of the trustee is attached to the office of trustee and is not personal:

 

"NRS 163.100   Powers of trustee attached to office.  Unless it is otherwise provided by the trust instrument or by court order, all powers of a trustee are attached to the office and are not personal."

 

27.        Respondents knew or should have known that until the resignation or death of one of the LFT Trustees nominated by Order of this Court of January 17, 1983, the remaining LFT Trustees did not have the power to appoint another Trustee.  LFT, article TWELFTH states in pertinent part:

 

"The Trustees may resign at any time.  Such resignation shall be effective after delivery of thirty (30) days written notice to the income beneficiaries of all the trust established by this trust agreement.  The Trustee who has resigned shall have no duty, obligation or right to appoint a successor Trustee.  A successor Trustee shall be appointed by the surviving Trustees.  In the event of the death, incompetence or disqualification of a Trustee, a successor Trustee will be appointed by the surviving Trustees."

Exhibit 3, article TWELFTH

 

28.        DAYTON was appointed LFT Trustee on January 17, 1983 and continually served as LFT Trustee until the date of his death on or about July 27, 2004.

29.        ROWLEY was appointed LFT Trustee from January 17, 1983 and continually served as LFT Trustee until the date of his death on or about August 28, 2004.

30.        MURPHY was appointed LFT Trustee on January 17, 1983 and continually served as LFT Trustee to the present date. 

31.        Respondents knew or should have known that until July 27, 2004, the date of decease of LFT Trustee DAYTON, there was no Trustee vacancy in the LFT and no LFT Trustee had the right or power to appoint a successor Trustee or to delegate the office, duties and obligation of an LFT Trustee to any another person or entity.

3.2.3 - Determination of Trustees' Fees

32.        Respondents knew or should have known that on August 23, 1983, this Court entered an Order providing for the method of determining Trustees' fees.  Said Order states in pertinent part:

 

 "IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Trustees of Trust A  and the Trustees of Trust B shall have the authority to retain legal and accounting services of their own selection ... ; provided

(i) the method of determining Trustees' fees to be paid as a cost of administration of the Trust shall first be presented to the Probate Court for approval.

                                          August 23, 1983 Court Order, p.17, lines 24-32

Exhibit 11

 

33.        Respondents knew or should have known that on May 24, 1984, this Court determined and ordered, in pertinent part:

 

"1. That compensation for Trustees of Trust B in the amount of $15,000 each for the period January 17, 1983  to August 23, 1983  is approved.

2. That a salary for the Trustees of Trust B in the amount of $2,000 per month each, commencing August 23, 1983 is approved."

May 24, 1984, Court Order §1 & §2

Exhibit 13

 

34.        Respondents knew or should have known that on June 25, 1996, this Court determined and ordered, in pertinent part:

 

"3. That the Trustees' compensation be raised to $3,000.00 per month each, ... effective July 1, 1996."                                                              

June 25, 1996 Court Order, §3.

Exhibit 36, p. #233

 

3.3        Trustees' attorneys

35.        Trustees' attorneys CR&R and/or REESE, pursuant to this Court's Orders of August 13, 1982 and January 17, 1983 were bound by the same requirements as LFT Trustees to provide Trust accountings in accordance with NRS §165.030 through NRS §165.120, to all Trust beneficiaries including remaindermen beneficiaries. NRS §165.020(b) and NRS §165.045.

36.        Trustees' attorneys CR&R and/or REESE pursuant to the retainer agreement dated September 1, 1983 with LFT Trustees were collectively and individually obligated to counsel, advise and assist Respondents LFT Trustees to timely provide true, correct, complete and accurate annual accountings in accordance with NRS §165.030 through NRS §165.120, and to provide competent, effective and efficient legal services to LFT Trustees a ccording to the highest legal and ethical standards.

3.4        Accountants

37.        In producing the accountings of the LFT, Respondents accountants Grant Thornton and MURPHY have a legal obligation to take into account the Last Will and Testament of William P. Lear, Sr.

38.        In producing the accountings of the LFT, Respondents accountants Grant Thornton and MURPHY have a legal obligation to take into account the terms and conditions of the LFT as lawfully amended by this Court.

39.        In producing the accountings of the LFT, Respondents accountants Grant Thornton and MURPHY have a legal obligation to abide by the Constitution and laws of the State of Nevada as well as the lawful judicial determinations of this Court with respect to the LFT.

40.        In producing the accountings of the LFT, Respondents accountants Grant Thornton and MURPHY have a legal obligation to abide by Constitution and laws of the United States of America.

41.        At all times relevant hereto, Respondents accountants Grant Thornton and MURPHY had an obligation to produce accounts which conformed with the Fiduciary Accounting Standards, the Standards for performing compilation engagements, the AICPA Code of Ethics, and any other standards as they relate to accounting where Respondents would be held liable by others similarly situated.

<continued on next page>

divider line
navigation bar Complete Petition to Set Aside Accountings - 34MB. next page home previous